Last week we’ve discussed several reasons clients are dissatisfied with the old model of outsourcing, and are insisting more and more that service providers use advanced tools and technologies for outsourcing governance.
Today we’ll take a look at a few more interesting points clients are making, as they make the shift from traditional outsourcing to modern outsourcing governance tools.
Regulation concerns
A big concern for clients today is the tight regulatory environment we all operate in. Companies can no longer afford to “outsource their mess,” leaving their IT infrastructure as some type of a black box, with no one knowing what’s inside. Not just cost concerns (are we overpaying for services we’re not really getting?) but also regulation concerns dictate that clients know exactly what their IT infrastructure is made of.
After deploying Blazent, Barclays’ CIO, Anthony Watson, says he “can [now] go to the regulators and say we understand our environment, the infrastructure end-to-end, the servers, where they’re located, what’s… running on those servers.”
So, who should use Blazent?
Acknowledging that the Blazent technology is incredibly valuable, as it provides visibility, governance, process, efficiency and control, the final question is – who should be using these advanced technologies? Should they be used by service providers, or by the clients themselves? One interesting point that was raised in the article: outsourcing, more and more a value play and supported by technology, is becoming a collaborative process, with clients and service providers working together to get the best results.
So, one scenario could be the service provider still being 100% in charge of all things related to IT infrastructure, and using Blazent to make sure the “outsourced mess” is not so messy anymore.
Or, clients could use Blazent themselves, like Barclays does, to get a better understanding of their IT infrastructure, whether prior to outsourcing it, or to manage regulation demands better. An argument in favor of this arrangement is that many clients are typically using several service providers, so in order to have a single comprehensive view of assets, the clients should be the ones using Blazent.
In the third scenario, both sides are using Blazent to get a crystal clear understanding of the assets being managed. This has great benefits in terms of preventing any billing disputes.
The bottom line is, using advanced tools such as Blazent is good for all parties, because everyone wants to focus on growth and innovation rather than on endless, frustrating dispute resolution meetings.




